I
am considering a WRIT course, called “Wanderlust and Design,” a sort of Heideggerean
project in wonder and discovery in writing. We would trace the act of
investigating ideas as a process that does not systematically press on toward a
goal but, rather, takes its time to savor the details and to investigate varied
perspectives, a process that stops to take measure and to dwell in possibility.
Following roads that lead on to roads, we would do close readings of several texts
by writers who “suss out” such things as
history and landscape, motorcycles and rhetoricians, carp and Conrad, women and
thread. We would examine the inter-disciplinary approach they adopt in order to
“curate” a piece of writing by tracing their research, their narratorial
stance, their critiques of culture, and their rhetorical choices. We would
attempt to determine the way they are able to coax out the unseen within the
seen, the imponderable within the pedestrian. And even as we work we would be
asking ourselves, also “What in the end makes this inter-disciplinary ‘wanderlust’
writing strategy so interesting?” “How does good writing both persuade and
inspire?”
Carol, the world is an eraser. At least the comments I previously posted here seem to have disappeared. I will try to recreate: this way of thinking about writing and ideas is quite seductive. In terms of ideas, I thought first of an essay coming out in the November issue of Literacy in Composition Studies, which describes an assignment asking students to use Google Maps to plot and annotate a literacy narrative. In some ways, that seems to be the opposite of wanderlust, but it's my best Friday afternoon idea.
ReplyDelete